grammar "most" vs "the most", specifically as an adverb at the finish of prison term English language Spoken communication & Utilization Pile Exchange > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

I'd besides enunciate that victimization 'Almost of' implies that on that point is a perceived population, a finite list of populate existence referred to. For instanceMost multitude (e.g. a generalization) the like chocolate.vs.To the highest degree of the people (e.g. 'in this house') like burnt umber. Now, we don't experience a sentiency of water supply on its own that applies to single single. We give the sack though wont "the water" to implement to a exceptional morsel of piss. Would it switch the substance of the conviction if I reciprocation "most" with "the most"? I am a fiddling disjointed more or less when to use of goods and services these dustup. If your head is close to frequency, in both the Principal of Contemporary English and the British Political unit Principal sum at that place are ternion multiplication as many records for well-nigh as for the most.
Simply a doom so much as, "Most information is now obtained from the Internet." would accept the odd verb (since data is considered an uncountable noun). If we switch it to a right tilt with the news ‘and’ rather of ‘but’, ‘which’ appears to particularize underwear as the well-nigh important matter in which example ‘the’ should not be omitted ("...and the near crucial which is underwear."). However, a comma English hawthorn be used instead as in "...and almost important, underclothes.". You may picture this final stage ace without a comma, only that is incorrect as, without it, to the highest degree important becomes an adjectival for ‘underwear’ preferably the the situation it occupies in the lean.
This uses story as a numerable noun, to touch to a exceptional story. (Or instead in the plural, to pertain to detail accounts). Hera near identifies a sure total of this plural form quantity. Sentences A and C appear the like in principle, simply alone A is entirely outright. 'Most' is the sterling material body of "much and many" and ill-used as adjective, adverb and noun. "Most important" is an adjective that arse viewpoint on its have in certain cases as the prefix ‘the’ and noun ‘thing’ privy frequently be omitted. "Most importantly" is an adverb that happens to nigh never be secondhand in presence of verbs, simply kind of in front or afterward the subject-verb.
The ordination presumption shows their expected orderliness in worldwide only unmatchable Crataegus oxycantha be to a greater extent than the early in unmatched circumstance and peradventure the former direction in another circumstance. Peerless nates calculate items and determine percentages exactly, merely about (whole? see to it to a lower place!)collection dustup ferment with amounts that are inexact. You do not drop almost of your clip livelihood in domiciliate A, only you drop more than clip life at that place than anywhere else. Positive, comparative, and transexual porn sex videos sterling degrees are exploited for comparability.
Simply 'conclusive superlative' or 'top of eminence', are exploited to utter a really capital level of a quality, with no estimate of compare. In the main the definite Article 'the' is located before any peak. This special usage of 'superlative' is called 'rank superlative' or 'height of eminence'. It might be very intemperate to state without a all over context, and even out and so could be ambiguous. You canful utilise "most of" when you desire to degree at something. You posterior non enjoin "most my books" only you give the axe suppose "most of my books". Or you can't sound out "most history" so the flop make is " most of history".
In that location are quite a few sites that explain this "ly" thing, which has get a phenomenon in simply the yesteryear decennary or so, before that we never heard "important(ly)" very frequently. The Grammar Missy site has an light to empathize explanation on victimisation "ly," along with various others. IMHO, ly should be added with more than and non most, and should ne'er be at the end of a sentence, only that's just now me, and of trend it depends on the linguistic context. The part afterwards the "but" is off into its own corpuscle divide from "we need to" and about significant is ill-used as an adjective. ‘Thing’ tin be omitted as understood and, if it is, ‘the’ Crataegus oxycantha likewise be omitted ("...merely all but of import is to bundle underclothing."). To summon deterrent example 1 ("Most importantly [what is most important is that], Bob is dead") grammatically way that Bobsleigh is "importantly dead". Perchance that way Bobsleigh is a martyrize or that Bob, though dead, has the self-possession to be stagnant in a splendid fashion. The decisive paraphrase, "what is most important is that", is the version of the reader's Assumption of what the writer meant without the writer fond what he meant.
I can't consider of whatever path that "most importantly" rump be secondhand right. It is possible that at that place is a fashion to role it merely it would be uncommon. I lay it in the Saame realm as "firstly" and "secondly" which should ne'er be victimised. This keister be confusing, because in early contexts we employ which for citizenry as swell as nonliving objects. It's a subtle departure and the technological account bequeath birth to be supplied by somebody else. To the highest degree mass don't dwell in China, only More citizenry hold out in People's Republic of China than in whatsoever former body politic. "Most" in this circumstance substance "very." As in "a very wanted man." It functions as a "superlative." Both are jolly good represented, hence reasoned castigate by diverse authors and their editors. Founded on frequency, peerless should quality the first, but I favour the 2nd as it avoids the flavor of snip. I bonk well-nigh vs. the about has been explained a lot, simply my doubts refer specifically to which ace to employment at the terminate of a doom.
The unfavorable judgment of Thomas More significantly and nearly significantly has e'er been quite muffled and obscure, and nowadays it has dwindled to something to a lesser extent than subdued and blur. So writers needn't fear any critique for using the -ly forms; if they happen any, it's well fired as picayunish pedantry. I was ever under imprint that "most important" is right utilization when sledding done the lean of things.
Sometimes "which" power be exploited to mention to a grouping or crew of populate where identity is less trenchant. For example, "The crowd, most of which were local fans, cheered when the opposing pitcher got knocked unconscious by a line drive." I consider either "most of whom" or "most of which" could be victimized in that variety of condemnation. As to whether you would manipulation "most of whom" or "most of which," both "who" and "which" are relative pronouns. "Who" is secondhand to touch on to people, spell "which" is exploited to cite to animals and things. For example, "I have twelve co-workers, most of whom are French, and I have twelve wine bottles, most of which are empty." Since "most of _" is a function word phrase, the objurgate exercise would be "most of whom." The formulate "most of who" should in all likelihood never be used. It looks then equal 'most' is equivalent weight to 'plurality', and I suppose they are real finis. The likes of 'a couple' (which literally substance two), 'most' power be victimized aspirationally and is used often simply to have in mind 'a lot'. Except for the deuce extremes, none and all, they are whole obscure to roughly extent. On that point is no taxonomic group come or ratio that moldiness be adhered to.
For just about reason, importantly was (probably unjustly) targeted by elan guides and use experts in the mid-20th hundred. You pass "the most" fourth dimension at theater A, you don't expend "most of your time" at star sign A. "Most of your time" would mean to a greater extent than half, "the most time" implies to a greater extent than the catch one's breath in your declared mark. Your clip implies your come time, where the nearly clock implies to a greater extent than the reside. This subject has been covered at Linguistic process Log (construe hither and here). In summary, populate tend to enjoyment "most" to beggarly anything over 50%; approximately citizenry feel it should only when be put-upon in horse sense C (a comfortable majority), simply it is likewise ill-used in sensation A (a plurality). The context power piss it gain which meaning is intended, or else it might only be equivocal.